Using Escrow in an E-2 Treaty Investor Application

E-2 applicants are sometimes advised that all investment funds must be spent irreversibly before the visa application is decided. That is not the law. The investment must be substantial, placed at risk in the commercial sense and irrevocably committed to the enterprise — but the regulations expressly permit an investor to use escrow pending issuance of the visa or approval of E-2 classification.

Short answer: Yes — E-2 investment funds may be placed in a genuine escrow arrangement pending visa issuance or approval of E classification. The investor must not keep a discretionary right to withdraw or redirect the funds, but the agreement may provide for their return following a properly defined final denial.

Investing from the UK or Japan? See our dedicated guides to E-2 visa escrow for UK investors and Japanese investors (日本語).

What the regulations actually say

The starting point is 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(e)(12). It requires the investor’s capital to be subject to partial or total loss if the fortunes of the business reverse, and to be irrevocably committed to the enterprise. The same provision then addresses escrow directly:

“The alien may use any legal mechanism available, such as the placement of invested funds in escrow pending admission in, or approval of, E classification, that would not only irrevocably commit funds to the enterprise, but might also extend personal liability protection to the treaty investor in the event the application for E classification is denied.”

8 C.F.R. § 214.2(e)(12)

The Department of State regulation reaches the same result in consular cases, permitting funds to be placed in escrow “pending visa issuance” as a means of establishing an irrevocable commitment (22 C.F.R. § 41.51(b)(7)). The Foreign Affairs Manual applies the related requirements that the capital be at risk in the commercial sense and that the commitment be real and irrevocable (9 FAM 402.9-6(B)).
There is, accordingly, no general rule that every dollar must be irretrievably spent before filing. The question is whether the investor has retained a discretionary right to recover or redirect the funds. A genuine escrow, from which the investor cannot withdraw at will, may satisfy the commitment requirement even though the agreement provides for return of the money if the E-2 application fails.

The approval condition must be identified correctly

A consular officer issues an E-2 visa. USCIS, by contrast, approves E-2 classification, commonly on an application to change or extend status. Referring only to “visa approval” may therefore be wrong in a USCIS case. The escrow and transaction documents should refer to visa issuance or approval of E-2 classification, whichever applies.

What can be invested: cash is not the only form

Investment capital is not limited to cash. Depending on the facts and the evidence, it may include:
  • Cash from savings, a genuine gift, inheritance or another lawful source;
  • Equipment or machinery transferred to the U.S. enterprise for use in its business;
  • Inventory acquired for the enterprise;
  • Intellectual property or other intangible assets whose ownership, transfer and value can be established; and
  • Loan proceeds for which the investor bears the required personal risk.
Non-cash property is not counted merely because the investor assigns a value to it — ownership, value, transfer to the enterprise and exposure to loss must be shown by reliable evidence. Loan proceeds ordinarily qualify where the debt is unsecured or secured by the investor’s personal assets; debt secured solely by the assets of the E-2 enterprise generally does not, because the investor has not placed personal capital at risk.

What a strong E-2 escrow agreement includes

An escrow agent — a bank, a licensed escrow company, or (where permitted) a law firm’s client account — holds the funds under a written agreement. A well-drafted E-2 escrow agreement usually provides that:
  • The agreed sum is deposited with the escrow agent, and any capital already spent is documented separately;
  • The investor cannot withdraw the money, redirect it, or use it for another purpose;
  • The funds are released to the seller or the enterprise when the specified E-2 approval event occurs;
  • The funds are returned only if the agreement’s narrowly defined denial or termination condition is met;
  • The release, termination and default provisions are aligned with the underlying purchase, franchise or subscription agreement;
  • An INA § 221(g) refusal is expressly excluded from any “final denial” that would release the funds; and
  • The agreement addresses withdrawal, abandonment, reapplication, an outside date, partial release, interest and bank charges, and what happens if the seller defaults.
Once the approval condition is satisfied and the funds are released, the capital must remain exposed to the commercial fortunes of the enterprise.

Escrow vs. the alternatives

Escrow is one way to satisfy the at-risk and irrevocable-commitment tests — not the only way, and not always the best fit. The main structures compare as follows:
Structure How it meets the at-risk & commitment test Protection if the visa is refused Best suited to
Escrow pending approval Funds are irrevocably committed but held by a neutral agent until the E-2 approval event. Potentially strong — covered funds may be returned following a properly defined final denial, subject to the escrow and underlying transaction documents. Purchases of an existing business or franchise with an identifiable closing.
Direct expenditure before filing Capital is actually spent on premises, equipment, inventory and services before adjudication. Low — money is already gone; only unused assets may retain value. Start-ups that must show the business is real, active or imminently operational.
Funds left in the business bank account Weakest — uncommitted cash in an account is often treated as mere possession of funds, not investment. The funds stay accessible — but that accessibility is precisely why they may not be treated as irrevocably committed. Rarely adequate alone; usually needs a genuine commitment step such as escrow or expenditure.
Staged / milestone funding Capital is released in tranches tied to business milestones, often combined with escrow. Moderate — depends on how much is committed or spent before the decision. Larger or phased projects where full deployment before filing is impractical.

Common escrow mistakes that can hurt an E-2 case

Escrow helps only when it is drafted correctly. The recurring errors that draw a request for evidence or a refusal are:
  • A refund condition that is too broad. A right to recover the funds after a change of mind, or because a better opportunity has appeared, is inconsistent with an irrevocable commitment.
  • Treating every 221(g) as a “denial.” A refusal under INA § 221(g) may be only administrative processing or a request for further evidence; if it triggers a refund, the funds can be released while the case is still alive.
  • Naming the wrong approval event. Referring only to “visa approval” is wrong in a USCIS change- or extension-of-status case, which turns on approval of E-2 classification rather than visa issuance.
  • Escrow and closing terms that conflict. If the purchase or franchise agreement preserves an unrestricted right to walk away, the deposit may not be irrevocably committed whatever the escrow agreement says.
  • Relying on escrow alone in a start-up. A new enterprise usually also needs evidence of genuine pre-opening expenditure; escrow is not a substitute for making the business operational.
The documents should deal expressly with final denial, withdrawal, abandonment, reapplication and any outside date for satisfaction of the condition. Immigration counsel should settle these provisions with the lawyer handling the underlying transaction and with the escrow agent.
Thinking about structuring your E-2 investment through escrow? The wording of the refund condition and the definition of “denial” can decide whether the funds are treated as irrevocably committed.

Acquisitions and start-ups

Escrow is most readily used on the purchase of an existing business or franchise, where the parties can identify the purchase price, the recipient and the closing event. It can also be used in a start-up, although it will seldom answer the whole investment question: a new enterprise usually needs evidence of genuine pre-opening expenditure to show it is real, active or imminently operational. Escrow may form part of that record, but it is not necessarily a substitute for the expenditure needed to make the business operational.

The bottom line

An E-2 applicant must commit capital to the enterprise, but need not disregard the immigration risk inherent in the transaction. Both the DHS and Department of State regulations expressly permit the use of escrow. The arrangement must, however, be genuine, narrowly conditioned and consistent with the underlying transaction. It protects only the funds covered by its terms; it does not recover professional fees already incurred, and it does not remove the ordinary credit, banking, currency or commercial risks of the deal. An applicant told that the entire investment must be spent before adjudication should have the proposed transaction reviewed before moving the funds.

Frequently asked questions

Can E-2 investment funds be held in escrow? Yes. Both the DHS regulation (8 C.F.R. § 214.2(e)(12)) and the Department of State regulation (22 C.F.R. § 41.51(b)(7)) expressly permit E-2 investment funds to be placed in escrow pending visa issuance or approval of E classification, provided the funds are irrevocably committed and the investor keeps no discretionary right to withdraw them.
Will I get my money back if the E-2 visa is denied? Only if the escrow agreement provides for return of the funds on a properly defined final denial and the investor did not retain a discretionary right to recover them. Escrow protects only the funds it covers — it does not recover professional fees or other expenditure already incurred, and it does not remove ordinary credit, banking, currency or commercial risk.
Is money sitting in escrow enough on its own to prove the E-2 investment? No. The capital must be substantial, at risk in the commercial sense and irrevocably committed. In a start-up case, escrow will seldom answer the whole investment question, because the enterprise usually also needs evidence of genuine pre-opening expenditure showing it is real and operational or imminently so.
Can I cancel the escrow or take the money back whenever I want? No. A discretionary right to withdraw or redirect the funds is inconsistent with the irrevocable-commitment requirement and can defeat the E-2 case. Any refund must be tied to a narrow, clearly defined denial or termination condition — not to the investor’s change of mind.
Does a 221(g) refusal trigger a refund from escrow? Not necessarily. A refusal under INA § 221(g) is often only administrative processing or a request for further evidence rather than a final denial. The escrow agreement should define “denial” carefully so that a 221(g) does not inadvertently release the funds while the case is still alive.
Should the escrow agreement be drafted by an immigration lawyer or a business lawyer? Both should be involved. Immigration counsel settles the approval condition and the definition of denial so the arrangement supports the E-2 case; transactional counsel aligns the escrow with the purchase, franchise or closing documents and with the escrow agent, so the release and termination provisions do not conflict.

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. E-2 eligibility and the appropriate investment structure depend on the facts of the case; immigration counsel should coordinate with transactional counsel where the investment involves a business purchase, franchise or other commercial agreement.

Latest case studies

Awards

Top 25 Immigration Attorneys


Top 25 EB-5 Immigration Attorneys 2023

Avvo Client Reviews Badge for Mark Ivan DaviesMark Ivan DaviesReviewsout of 24 reviews

E-2 Visa EB-1C Pathway Myth Busted!

The L-1 visa has no advantage over the E-2 visa in terms of pathway to a Green Card. If an E-2 visa holder meets the EB-1C criteria then the “pathway” is identical to the holder of an L-1 visa.



E-2 Visas for UK Citizens E-2 Visas for UK Citizens

E-2 Visas for Italians E-2 Visas for Italians

E-2 Visas for Australians E-2 Visas for Australians

E-2 Visas for Singaporeans E-2 Visas for Singaporeans

E-2 Visas in New York City E-2 Visas in New York City

E-2 Visas for Canadians E-2 Visas for Canadians

E-2 Visas from the UAE E-2 Visas from the UAE

E-2 Visas for Argentinians E-2 Visas for Argentinians

E-2 Visas for Germans E-2 Visas for Germans

E-2 Visas for French E-2 Visas for French

E-2 Visas for Turkish E-2 Visas for Turkish

E-2 Visas for Grenadians E-2 Visas for Grenadians

E-2 Visas for Taiwanese E-2 Visas for Taiwanese


Davies & Associates BBB Business Review logo

Davies & Associates Trustpilot reviews badge



Request Free Consultation
Yes, I agree to receive occasional text messages (SMS)
 
Confidential. No obligation. We do not sell your information.

Contact Davies & Associates Offices in United States

Check all of our locations around the world.

Looking to acquire an ?

We are known for our creative solutions that obtain "impossible" visas. We solve the most complex immigration problems for businesses, investors, individuals, and families.

Immigration lawyer near me

Looking to relocate or having trouble with a visa application?

We are known for our creative solutions that obtain "impossible" visas. We solve the most complex immigration problems for business, investors, individuals and families.

Request Free Consultation