US Visa Legal services English
|
Vietnamese Tiếng Việt
LANG:

E-2 Visa Requirements in 2026:
Complete Eligibility, Investment Rules, Treaty Countries & Legal Guide

Last Updated: May 2026
Written by: Mark I. Davies, Esq., MBA (Wharton School), Fellow University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. Ga. Bar License #: 250186, AILA Member, SRA ID: #384468.
Reviewed by: Sukanya Raman, Esq., Managing Attorney Davies & Associates, India

E2 Visa CostsUK E-2 Visa GuideWhy Choose D&A?E-2 Application ProcessE-2 Visa RequirementsE-2 Investment RequirementsFinding an E-2 Business in the USE2 RenewalsE2 FAQsE2 Visa ProcessUK Immigration BlogScottish E2 Visa ProcessScottish E2 Visa LawyerLearn about International Entrepreneur Rule as an alternative to E-2

An E-2 visa is a U.S. nonimmigrant treaty investor visa that allows nationals of treaty countries to live in the United States to direct a business in which they have made a substantial investment. Around 80 countries currently qualify; see our E-2 treaty countries page for the full list. Treaty-country employees of an E-2 enterprise, and the principal investor’s spouse and unmarried children under 21, may also qualify under separate rules. For a broader overview of how the E-2 fits into U.S. investor-visa options, see our main E-2 Treaty Investor Visa guide.
Qualification is a legal-standards test, not a checklist of dollar figures. There is no fixed minimum investment amount under U.S. immigration law. Consular officers and USCIS adjudicators evaluate the application as a whole, weighing the size and structure of the investment, the lawfulness and traceability of the funds, the operational reality of the business, and the credibility of the investor’s role. Investment amount alone is never sufficient. To qualify for an E-2 visa in 2026, an applicant must satisfy seven core requirements (treaty-country nationality; substantial at-risk investment; a real and operating commercial enterprise; ownership and operational control; develop-and-direct the business; non-marginal viability; and intent to depart when E-2 status ends) and must also evidence the lawful source of every dollar invested.
E-2 Visa Requirements at a Glance (2026)
  • Nationality: Citizen of an E-2 treaty country (the UK, Japan, Italy, Singapore, Grenada, Turkey, and around 75 others). Permanent residence is not enough.
  • Investment amount: No statutory minimum. Successful E-2 investments commonly range from USD 100,000 to 300,000, but lower amounts can qualify for service businesses where the investment is proportional to total start-up cost.
  • Source of funds: Must be lawful, fully traceable, and personally controlled by the investor.
  • Business: Must be a real, active, for-profit commercial enterprise (a “bona fide enterprise”). Passive investments such as undeveloped land or pure stock holdings do not qualify.
  • Marginality: The business must generate more than minimal living income for the investor and family, either now or within five years. There is no minimum employee count.
  • Ownership and control: The investor (or treaty-national owners collectively) must own at least 50% of the enterprise or otherwise hold operational control through voting rights or a managerial position.
  • Intent: The applicant must intend to depart the U.S. when E-2 status ends. The E-2 is not a dual intent visa.
  • Validity: Up to five years per visa stamp (depending on the country’s reciprocity schedule), with admission to the U.S. in two-year increments. No statutory cap on renewals.
April 2026 Update: Davies & Associates secured E-2 approval at the U.S. Embassy in London for HeadLight Glasses — a zero-employee case at filing, with investment based on inventory and Facebook ads. See the marginality section below for why this matters.

Table of Contents

Not sure this is the right page?

This page focuses on E-2 visa eligibility requirements. If you are looking for something more specific:

Executive Summary: E-2 Visa Requirements in 2026

What is an E-2 Visa

The E-2 Treaty Investor Visa allows nationals of certain treaty countries to invest in and direct a U.S. business. It is widely used by entrepreneurs, small business owners, and international investors seeking to live in the United States while operating an active commercial enterprise.
E-2 adjudication is governed by a layered framework of statute, regulation, and policy guidance. The principal sources are:
  • Statute: INA § 101(a)(15)(E), codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(E). This is the underlying immigration-law authority for treaty trader and treaty investor classification.
  • USCIS Regulations: 8 CFR § 214.2(e), which governs change of status and extension requests filed inside the United States.
  • State Department Regulations: 22 CFR § 41.51, which governs E visa issuance at U.S. consulates abroad.
  • State Department Policy: 9 FAM 402.9, the Foreign Affairs Manual chapter used by consular officers worldwide. It was refreshed on 17 February 2026 under change transmittal CT:VISA-2190.
  • USCIS Policy: USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 2, Part B, used for change-of-status and extension cases adjudicated by USCIS.
Critical distinction: Consular officers report to the Department of State and follow the FAM; they are not bound by the USCIS Policy Manual. Most E-2 visa applications worldwide are adjudicated at U.S. consulates, so the FAM is the controlling document in those cases. This is why our citations on this page draw on 9 FAM 402.9 wherever consular practice is at issue.

Three Kinds of Treaties Underlying the E-2 Visa

Not all E-2 treaty rights are identical. The U.S. has entered into three types of arrangements that confer E-2 eligibility, and the underlying treaty type can affect what an investor or employee is permitted to do:
  • Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (FCNs): The traditional basis for most E-1 and E-2 treaty rights, governing both trade and investment. Examples include the UK, Italy, Japan, and Germany treaties.
  • Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs): Directed solely at investment, BITs allow for E-2 status only (no E-1). However, BITs are more expansive than traditional FCNs because they apply to foreign nationals who establish, administer, or advise an enterprise, not merely to those who develop or direct it.
  • Free Trade Agreements (USMCA / Fast Track): The U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement and similar arrangements contain both E-1 and E-2 components for Canadian and Mexican nationals.
Treaty type also matters because treaties can be terminated. For example, the U.S.–Ecuador BIT was terminated effective 18 May 2018, and the U.S.–Iran treaty was terminated as of 3 October 2018, with E visa privileges suspended for new applicants. For the complete current list of E-2 treaty countries, see 9 FAM 402.9-10 and our E-2 Treaty Countries page.

Three Kinds of E-2 Visas

There are three main E-2 classifications discussed on this page: the E-2 Principal Investor Visa, the E-2 Employee Visa, and the E-2 Derivative Visa for spouses and dependent children. Each is examined in detail in its dedicated requirement section below.

Where This Page Fits Within the Broader E-2 Guide

This page focuses narrowly on E-2 eligibility and requirements. For a broader overview of how the E-2 visa works in practice, including processing times, costs, renewals, and strategic considerations, see our comprehensive E-2 Visa Guide.

Seven Core E-2 Investor Requirements, Plus Source-of-Funds Evidence and Employee/UK Rules

Most U.S. immigration lawyers describe E-2 eligibility as seven core requirements that the principal investor must satisfy. A separate body of source-of-funds evidence rules applies to the investment regardless of which requirement is being examined, and a third set of rules governs E-2 employees and the UK-specific "inhabitant" test. The accordion below summarises each; full analysis follows in its own section.
1. What is the E-2 Treaty Country Requirement? The E-2 treaty country requirement means the investor (and where relevant, the qualifying enterprise) must hold the nationality of a U.S. treaty country at the time of filing.
2. What is the E-2 Investment Requirement? The E-2 investment requirement means the applicant must make a substantial, at-risk, and irrevocably committed investment in a real U.S. business.
3. What is the E-2 Business Requirement? The E-2 business requirement means the enterprise must be real, active, and operating; producing goods or services for profit. Passive holdings and speculative ventures do not qualify.
4. What is the E-2 Ownership and Control Requirement? The E-2 ownership-and-control requirement means the investor (or treaty-national owners collectively) must own at least 50 percent of the enterprise, or otherwise hold operational control through voting rights or a managerial role.
5. What is the E-2 Develop and Direct Requirement? The E-2 develop-and-direct requirement means the investor must enter the United States solely to direct, develop, and actively manage the enterprise. Passive ownership does not qualify.
6. What is the E-2 Marginality Requirement? The E-2 marginality requirement means the business must have the present or future capacity to generate more than minimal living income for the investor and family. Future capacity is assessed within five years.
7. What is the E-2 Intent to Depart Requirement? The E-2 intent-to-depart requirement means the applicant must intend to leave the United States when E-2 status ends. The E-2 is not a dual intent visa, but an "unequivocal" expression of intent at the consular interview is normally sufficient.
8. What Source-of-Funds Evidence Is Required? (Evidence rules; applies across all of the above)
All invested capital must be lawfully obtained, fully traceable from origin to U.S. business, personally controlled by the investor, and at risk of partial or total loss. The investor must produce a contemporaneous documentary trail showing both the lawful source of the funds and the path the funds took from that source to the U.S. enterprise.
9. What are the E-2 Employee Requirements? (Cases involving employees only)
E-2 employees qualify only if they share the enterprise's nationality and hold executive, supervisory, or essential-skills roles.
10. Is there a Special Rule for UK Applicants (E-2 "Inhabitant" Requirement)? (UK cases only)
Yes. The E-2 U.K. inhabitant rule requires that British nationals were resident in the United Kingdom on the date the treaty entered into force. UK applicants should read our dedicated E-2 Visa Guide for British Citizens for London consular processing detail, or test their eligibility with our UK Visa Eligibility Tool.

Treaty Country Requirement for an E-2 Visa

The E-2 visa is only available to citizens of countries that have a qualifying treaty with the United States. Around 80 countries currently qualify, including the United Kingdom, Japan, Italy, Singapore, Germany, France, Spain, Australia, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, Grenada, and Turkey. The qualifying treaty may take three forms: a Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (FCN); a Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT); or a Free Trade Agreement such as the USMCA. Permanent residence in a treaty country does not qualify; the applicant must hold the citizenship. The rule is set out in 8 CFR 214.2(e)(2)(i) and elaborated in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 2, Part B.
The nationality requirement applies to both the individual investor and, where the applicant is an E-2 employee, the business entity through which they apply. As explained in the Three Kinds of Treaties section above, the form of the treaty matters only for legal completeness; in practice, any of the three creates the same E-2 eligibility. For a full list of qualifying countries see the E-2 treaty countries page.

Business Nationality

A business is deemed to have the nationality of its owner(s). At least 50% of the business must be owned by treaty nationals with the same nationality as the E-2 visa applicant for the nationalities to match.
In the case of public businesses, a business is deemed to have the nationality of the country in which its shares are listed. Owing to heavy utilization of the E-2 employee visa by the Japanese motor industry, Japan is the largest source of E-2 visa applications.
Where a business is owned 50/50 by persons of different nationalities the business has the nationality of both owners.

Examples of E-2 Business Nationality

Ownership Structure Resulting E-2 Enterprise Nationality
100% UK ownership UK enterprise
60% Italian / 40% Singaporean Italian enterprise
Japanese public company Japanese enterprise
50% Japanese / 50% Singaporean Japanese enterprise and Singaporean enterprise
Maximum E-2 visa validity also depends on nationality and is stated in the U.S. Department of State’s reciprocity tables. An amalgamated version of the tables can be read by following this link.

Country-specific notes: Singaporean nationals can read our dedicated E-2 Visa Guide for Singapore, which covers consular procedures at the U.S. Embassy at 27 Napier Road, including the rule that attorneys may attend E-2 interviews in person. Japanese applicants should review our E-2 Visa Guide for Japanese Citizens for U.S. Embassy Tokyo and Consulate General Osaka-Kobe procedures, and Italian applicants should consult our Italian-language guide at vistoe2usa.it.

Evidence Required to Prove E-2 Nationality

For E-2 visa cases, it is often necessary to evidence the nationality of the E-2 business as well as the individual applicants. A business is given the nationality of its majority owners. Typical acceptable evidence includes:
  • For Individuals:
    • Valid passport(s)
  • For Businesses:
    • Corporate share certificates (for businesses)
    • Articles of Incorporation / Operating Agreement
    • Capitalization table (cap table)
    • Shareholder register
    • Ultimate beneficial ownership disclosures for layered entities
    • Notarized ownership affidavits (if necessary)
Where holding companies are used, you must document ownership all the way up the chain to show treaty-country control.

Where Treaty Country Cases Most Often Go Wrong

Treaty Country Requirement Pitfalls
  • ✘ Relying on residence instead of citizenship: A permanent resident of a treaty country does not qualify unless they hold citizenship.
  • ✘ Using a business with unclear or mixed ownership: If treaty-country owner falls below 50 percent, even temporarily, the business loses E-2 qualification.
  • ✘ Incorrectly structured holding companies: Layered corporate structures must be fully documented.
  • ✘ Employee nationality mismatch: Employees must match the enterprise nationality, not the principal investor personal nationality (if different).

Dual Nationality and the Passport-of-Entry Rule

Dual nationals must choose carefully which nationality they will rely on for E-2 purposes. Under Matter of Ognibene, 18 I&N Dec. 425 (BIA 1983), the nationality claimed by a dual national at the time of entry into the United States is regarded as their sole nationality for the duration of that stay for purposes of INA § 214. A dual national of Venezuela and Italy who entered the U.S. on a Venezuelan passport, for example, cannot later change status to E-2 based on Italian nationality, because Venezuela is not an E-2 treaty country.
Similarly, U.S. citizens who hold dual nationality with a treaty country generally cannot assert the foreign nationality to bring in E-2 employees where they have asserted U.S. citizenship as their predominant nationality (Matter of Damioli, 17 I&N Dec. 303 (BIA 1980)). Planning the order of entries, passport use, and any change-of-status filing is therefore critical for dual nationals.

Lawful Permanent Residents Cannot Count Toward the 50 Percent Threshold

Under 9 FAM 402.9-4(B)(e), lawful permanent residents (green-card holders) of the United States who happen to also be nationals of the treaty country cannot have their stock counted when determining whether the U.S. business satisfies the 50 percent nationality threshold. This is a frequent source of confusion in family-owned businesses where some owners have become U.S. permanent residents while others remain treaty-country nationals.
The rule has two practical consequences:
  • An LPR cannot serve as the E-2 principal investor or sponsor E-2 employees (LPRs must instead pursue a green-card-based business strategy).
  • If an existing E-2 enterprise sees enough of its treaty-national owners obtain U.S. permanent residence that the company falls below 50 percent treaty ownership, the company may lose E-2 qualification and should be reviewed urgently. This applies even if previously issued E-2 visas in passports remain unexpired, and employees in the U.S. at the time of such a change can fall out of status.

Citizenship-by-Investment: The 3-Year Domicile Requirement

Investors who acquire treaty-country nationality through financial investment (commonly via Grenada or Turkey citizenship-by-investment programs) face an additional hurdle. Under INA § 101(a)(15)(E), as amended by Public Law 117-263 effective 27 December 2022, an applicant (and their spouse) who naturalized through financial investment is barred from applying for an E visa until they have been domiciled in the treaty country for a continuous period of not less than 3 years.
Key points:
  • The rule applies prospectively. Persons who obtained their citizenship in an E country through financial investment prior to 27 December 2022 are not subject to the 3-year domicile bar.
  • "Domicile" is a stricter concept than "residence" and generally requires the applicant to make the treaty country their true, permanent home for the qualifying period.
  • The bar applies specifically to citizenship acquired through financial investment. Naturalization through descent, marriage, or other non-investment routes is not subject to the 3-year bar.
This rule is the single most consequential 2022 change for E-2 strategy for nationals of non-treaty countries such as India, China, Russia, Vietnam, and Nigeria.

Non-Treaty Nationals: India, China, Vietnam and Other Excluded Countries

Citizens of countries that do not have a qualifying treaty with the United States, including India, China, Vietnam, Russia, Nigeria, and South Africa, cannot apply directly for an E-2 visa. Two main routes exist for nationals of these countries:
  • Citizenship by Investment (CBI): Obtain citizenship in an E-2 treaty country first, most commonly Grenada or Turkey, and then apply for the E-2 visa using the new nationality. U.S. law requires three years of domicile in the treaty country after a financial-investment-based naturalization.
  • EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visa: Indian and Chinese investors frequently bypass the E-2 entirely and pursue the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program, which leads directly to a U.S. Green Card. The minimum investment is USD 800,000 in a Targeted Employment Area or USD 1,050,000 elsewhere.

What Counts as a Substantial E-2 Investment?

A substantial E-2 investment is evaluated in proportion to the total cost of purchasing or establishing the business, not against a fixed dollar threshold. U.S. immigration law sets no statutory minimum. In practice, successful E-2 investments commonly range from USD 100,000 to 300,000, but lower amounts can qualify where the investor funds close to the full start-up cost of a low-cost service business. The capital must also be lawful, fully at risk, and irrevocably committed to the enterprise. The rule is defined in 8 CFR 214.2(e)(12) and elaborated in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 2, Part B. The goal is to ensure the applicant is genuinely engaged in launching or operating an active commercial business and that the investment is sufficient to make the enterprise viable.

What Counts as a “Substantial” E-2 Investment

To qualify for an E-2 visa, the investor must make a substantial investment in a real and operating enterprise.
Definition of Substantial for an E-2 Visa Purpose
A substantial E-2 investment is one that is large enough to ensure the business’s successful operation and is not a marginal enterprise.

How the E-2 Proportionality Test Works

The regulations do not define a fixed minimum dollar amount. Instead, substantiality is determined using two key tests:
  1. The Proportionality Test
    USCIS evaluates the relationship between the amount invested and the total cost of purchasing or creating the business.
    • For low-cost service businesses, the investment must approach 100 percent of the start-up cost.
    • For higher-cost businesses, the investment may be a reasonable percentage of the total cost.
    This flexible test ensures that the level of investment aligns with the nature of the enterprise.
  2. Magnitude Sufficient for Success
    The investment must be enough to ensure the business is viable, not undercapitalized.
In practice:
  • Successful E-2 investments often fall between USD 100,000 and 300,000.
  • Lower amounts can qualify where they are proportional to the total cost of a lean business and supported by strong operational evidence.

How Officers Evaluate E-2 Investment Substantiality

Using the proportionality test:
  • Low-cost businesses: investment approaches 100% of total start-up cost.
  • Higher-capital businesses: investment can be a reasonable percentage of project cost.
  • There is no minimum dollar threshold.

Evidence That Helps Prove E-2 Investment Substantiality

  • Invoices, receipts, wire transfers
  • Executed lease + deposit
  • Equipment and inventory purchases
  • Franchise fees and licensing costs
  • Escrow agreements conditioned on E-2 approval
  • Business formation documents
  • Five-year financial plan and cost breakdown

Common Mistakes That Lead to Substantiality Denials

E-2 Investment Visa Substantiality Denial Flags
  • ✘ Investment too low for the business type
  • ✘ Funds sitting unused on personal accounts
  • ✘ Contingent or speculative commitments
  • ✘ Undercapitalized business models
  • ✘ Unsupported or inflated cost estimates
  • ✘ Loans secured by business assets (not personal assets)

What Can Be Valued as Investment Capital

The investment need not be all cash. Under 9 FAM 402.9-6(B)(f)–(h), the following may count toward the qualifying investment amount, provided they can be valued reliably:
  • Cash committed to the enterprise, whether spent or held in escrow conditional on visa approval.
  • Equipment and inventory purchases, counted at fair market value (Matter of Khan, 16 I&N Dec. 138 (BIA 1977)).
  • Rent on premises or equipment, limited to the funds actually devoted in each month, unless prepaid in advance (Matter of Shaw, 15 I&N Dec. 794 (BIA 1976)).
  • Transfer of goods and machinery to the United States, counted at fair market value provided they will be put to use in the enterprise.
  • Intangible or intellectual property such as trademarks, patents, software, and brand value. These assets may be capitalized as part of the investment. Where fair market value cannot be established, the value of current publishing or manufacturing contracts may substitute, and the Department of State will accept expert opinions on value where neither is available. This is the principal route by which UK fashion businesses, for example, capitalize the value of their brand into a U.S. E-2 enterprise through a licence agreement.
What cannot be counted: inherited businesses (although inherited funds can be invested), uncommitted funds sitting in a personal account, or speculative future contributions.

Examples of Substantial Investments (Illustrative Only)

Below are realistic fictional examples showing how different business models meet the substantiality standard:
Example 1: Boutique Café Acquisition — Total Cost $310,000
  • $280,000 paid toward asset purchase
  • $18,000 in equipment upgrades
  • $12,000 in initial inventory and supplies
    Result: Substantial. Investor has committed over 90% of the acquisition cost and is fully capitalized for launch.
Example 2: Consulting Firm Start-Up — Total Cost $85,000
  • $45,000 committed to first-year salaries and contractors
  • $18,000 office lease + deposit
  • $12,000 equipment and software
  • $10,000 marketing and client acquisition
    Result: Substantial. Even at a lower cost, investment covers nearly all start-up needs and is essential to viability.
Example 3: Franchise Fitness Studio — Total Cost $420,000
  • $150,000 franchise fee + build-out deposit
  • $180,000 equipment purchase
  • $40,000 marketing and pre-sales
  • $50,000 working capital
    Result: Substantial. Funds are proportional to a high-cost venture and demonstrate readiness to operate.
Example 4: E-Commerce Retail Business — Total Cost $120,000
  • $65,000 inventory purchased
  • $25,000 warehouse lease + deposits
  • $20,000 software, website, and fulfillment systems
  • $10,000 logistics and marketing
    Result: Substantial. Fully committed funds for inventory and logistics meet E-2 standards.
Example 5: Rock Climbing Business — Total Cost $80,000 (example based on a real, approved case)
  • $40,000 escrowed cash for business operations
  • $10,000 climbing equipment
  • $25,000 specialized video equipment
  • $5,000 pre-paid lease costs
    Result: Substantial. Investment is sufficient to open and run the business.

E-2 Visa Investments Must Be “At Risk”

Definition of At Risk for an E-2 Visa
For E-2 purposes, funds are at risk when the investor is personally and primarily liable for any losses the business might incur.
The funds must be:
  • Legally owned by the investor
  • Personally committed
  • Vulnerable to partial or total loss if the business fails
The “At Risk” requirement means that speculative or passive investments do not qualify for E-2 visa purposes.
The following do not qualify as “At Risk”:
  • Funds secured by business assets (rather than personal assets)
  • Promissory notes not backed by the investor’s personal property
  • Contingent investments that depend on visa approval
  • Passive equity holdings without operational involvement
The requirement is codified in 8 CFR 214.2(e)(12).

Investment Must Be Irrevocably Committed

The regulations require that funds be “irrevocably committed” to the enterprise before visa issuance. In practice, this means the investor has taken steps that are legally binding or demonstrate a clear intent to complete the investment, and would be unable to withdraw the funds at will.

Examples of investments which are ‘irrevocably committed’ include:

  • Executed leases
  • Equipment purchases
  • Inventory purchases
  • Franchise fees paid
  • Deposits in escrow with release upon visa issuance (allowed only in very specific structures)
  • Transfers of capital into the business bank account followed by expenditure
  • Contracts signed with personal liability
Not acceptable:
  • Funds merely sitting in a personal bank account
  • Uncommitted personal savings
  • Investment “plans” without executed transactions

Why Escrow Is the Most Underappreciated Way to Prove E-2 Funds Are “At Risk”

An E-2 escrow agreement is a legally binding contract in which the investor’s funds are held by a neutral third party and automatically released to complete the investment only if the E-2 visa is approved. Escrow remains one of the most underused yet powerful tools in E-2 visa strategy. Although many investors overlook it, both USCIS and the Department of State (especially 9 FAM 402.9-6(B)) confirm that properly structured escrow satisfies the requirement that funds be “at risk” for E-2 purposes.
A well-drafted escrow agreement makes the investor legally obligated to proceed if the visa is approved, while still allowing the funds to be returned if the visa is refused.

Benefits of Escrow to an E-2 Investor

  • Proves funds are committed and at risk without exposing the investor to unnecessary financial loss.
  • Protects the investor by ensuring funds are returned automatically if the visa is denied.
  • Satisfies consular expectations under 9 FAM 402.9-6(B).
  • Creates clear documentation that strengthens the E-2 application.
  • Allows purchase or start-up expenditures to be finalized only upon visa approval.

Why Escrow Helps Prove an E-2 Investment Is “At Risk”

  • Meets 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(e)(12) requirements.
  • Binds the investor to complete the investment upon approval.
  • Prevents withdrawal of funds except if the visa is denied.
  • Explicitly recognized in 9 FAM 402.9-6(B).

Using Escrow to Purchase an Existing Business

Escrow can hold the full purchase price or agreed portion.
  • Funds are released automatically upon E-2 approval.
  • Funds return to the investor if the visa is denied.

Using Escrow for Start-Up Costs of a New Business

Escrow may hold:
  • Inventory
  • Equipment
  • Contractor payments
  • Lease deposits
  • Franchise fees
USCIS and DOS have confirmed this method is acceptable when the investor is bound to proceed once approved.

Loans and E-2 Visa Financing Restrictions

Loans are permitted only if:
  • They are secured using the investor’s personal assets (e.g., a mortgage on their home), and
  • The investor is personally liable.
Loans not permitted:
  • Secured by business assets.
  • Secured by assets of the E-2 enterprise itself.
  • With no personal liability.
This derives from the requirement that the investor’s personal capital must be at risk.

Timing of the Investment

The investment must be:
  • Already made
  • Actively in the process of being made, or
  • In Escrow
"Intent to invest" alone is not enough but “irrevocably committed funds” which have not yet been spent are sufficient.
USCIS considers:
  • Signed contracts
  • Proof of funds transferred
  • Evidence of expenditures
  • Leases executed
  • Inventory orders
  • Operational preparations
The governing standard is described in the USCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 2.

What Evidence Can be Used to Prove the Investment?

Typical documentation includes:
  • Bank statements
  • Wire transfers
  • Sales contracts
  • Asset purchase agreements
  • Franchise agreements
  • Invoices and receipts
  • Escrow agreements
  • Copies of checks
  • General ledger entries
  • Proof of personal liability for loans
  • Business formation documents
  • Start-up or acquisition cost breakdowns

Where E-2 Investments Most Often Fall Short

E-2 Investment Visa Denial Flags
  • ✘ Investment not committed: Funds left untouched in a personal account or not yet deployed.
  • ✘ Insufficient investment for business type: For example, trying to open a restaurant with a USD 30,000 investment.
  • ✘ Business deemed undercapitalized: Lack of working capital, unrealistic financial projections, or inadequate start-up funding.
  • ✘ Funds not at risk: Loans secured by business assets or contingent investment structures.
  • ✘ Failure to document sources and path of funds: Missing bank records, missing sale agreements, unclear transfer history.

Understanding the E-2 Marginality Requirement

An E-2 business must have the present or future capacity to generate more than minimal living income for the investor and family. A "marginal" business is one that exists only to support the investor and immediate family with no realistic prospect of doing more, and an E-2 visa will not be granted for such a business. Future capacity is assessed within five years, which makes a credible five-year financial projection the single most important piece of evidence on this requirement. There is no statutory minimum employee count, but creating U.S. jobs is the most effective way to demonstrate non-marginality in practice. The rule is set out in 8 CFR 214.2(e)(15) and 22 CFR 41.51(b)(10).

How to Demonstrate the Enterprise Is Not Marginal

  • Credible five-year financial projections
  • A hiring plan or existing employees
  • Contracts, letters of intent, supplier or client pipeline
  • Realistic market analysis showing the business can scale

What Evidence of Marginality do E-2 Visa Consular Officers Look for?

  • Will the business employ U.S. workers soon?
  • Does it have realistic revenue potential?
  • Is it funded well enough to grow?
  • Is it more than a one-person, self-employment model?

Examples of Marginal Enterprises

  • Solo service providers with no expansion plan
  • Undercapitalized businesses with low revenue potential
  • Unrealistic projections unsupported by evidence
  • Businesses relying on hoped-for future clients only

What Common Mistakes Lead to E-2 Marginality Refusals?

E-2 Investment Visa Marginality Denial Flags
  • ✘ Self-employment with no hiring plan
  • ✘ Inflated or unsupported financial projections
  • ✘ Insufficient working capital
  • ✘ Weak operational or market evidence
  • ✘ Business models that cannot scale beyond supporting the investor

Why Job Creation Is the Easiest Way to Defeat Marginality

There is no statutory or regulatory requirement that an E-2 business employ a minimum number of U.S. workers. The rule in 8 CFR 214.2(e)(15) and 22 CFR 41.51(b)(10) requires only the present or future capacity to generate more than minimal living income for the investor and family, with future capacity assessed within five years.
Cases with zero employees at the time of filing can absolutely be approved. Davies & Associates secured one such approval in April 2026: the HeadLight Glasses E-2 case at the U.S. Embassy in London (linked at the top of this page), where the investment was based on inventory and digital advertising spend with no employees on payroll at filing.
That said, creating U.S. jobs is the single most effective way to demonstrate non-marginality in practice. A credible plan to hire U.S. workers, or evidence of hires already made, is what consular officers and USCIS adjudicators look for most readily because it answers the marginality question on its face. The more jobs the business is creating or credibly plans to create, the lower the marginality risk.
Other equally valid ways to defeat marginality (separately or in combination) include:
  • A capital investment large enough that the business will plainly generate revenue above minimal living needs
  • A credible five-year financial plan showing scale beyond a single-operator model
  • Documented contracts, letters of intent, or a customer pipeline
  • Use of contractors, agencies, or outsourced labor that drives economic activity even without direct hires
  • Evidence the investor has other sources of income, so the business is not relied on as the sole means of subsistence
The strongest applications combine more than one of these. A small service business with one employee plus a documented 12-month hiring plan, for example, is significantly stronger than the same business presented as a solo enterprise.

Consular Posts Apply the Marginality Test Differently — and That Variation Is Not Published Anywhere

How strictly the marginality test is applied varies significantly from one U.S. consulate to another. The same business plan that secures approval in London may face skepticism in another post, and vice versa. That variation is not written down on any consulate website or in 9 FAM 402.9; it lives in the operational practice of individual visa units and the institutional memory built up by the small number of attorneys who work each post regularly.
In our experience, some U.S. consulates are notably more permissive on solo-operator and lean-staffing models, while others apply a much higher implicit bar and effectively expect a meaningful hiring plan even though no rule requires one. The differences extend to evidentiary preferences, how five-year projections are weighed, and how skeptically zero-employee cases are received. None of this is documented publicly.
This is the single biggest reason to engage an immigration attorney with direct, current experience at the specific U.S. consulate where the case will be filed. Knowing how the London E-2 unit weighs a digital-advertising-spend investment differs from knowing how Tokyo, Frankfurt, or Singapore weighs the same evidence, and that knowledge is not available on any government website. It comes from cases filed at that post in the last 6–12 months.

Business Requirements for an E-2 Company

An E-2 business must be a real, active, operating, for-profit commercial enterprise that produces goods or services. The statutory term used in INA § 101(a)(15)(E) is "bona fide enterprise," meaning a genuine commercial undertaking, not a passive vehicle. Speculative ventures, paper holding companies, idle land investments, and pure stock or fund portfolios do not qualify. The business must be operational, or "immediately capable of commencing operations," at the time the visa is adjudicated. Most successful E-2 enterprises fall into one of three categories: a newly established start-up with all infrastructure in place; an acquired existing business; or a franchise with a signed franchise agreement, secured premises, and inventory.

The E-2 Visa Enterprise Must Have Necessary Operational Infrastructure

USCIS examines whether the business is operational or “immediately capable of commencing operations.” An enterprise meets this standard once it has secured the necessary premises, inventory, equipment, licences, and other infrastructure required to begin trading. Operational businesses generally have:
  • Relevant licenses and permits
  • Leases or virtual office agreements (depending on business type)
  • Relevant equipment, inventory, or tools
  • A website and business email
  • Vendor or supplier contracts
  • Insurance policies
  • Operating agreements
  • Payroll systems
  • Corporate bank accounts
A business with no infrastructure or operational footprint is likely to be considered speculative.

Evidence to Prove the Enterprise Is Real and Operating

Typical documentation includes:
  • Business registration documents
  • Articles of Organization/Incorporation
  • Federal EIN
  • Business licenses and permits
  • Lease agreements
  • Utility bills
  • Insurance policies
  • Payroll records and employee lists
  • Vendor contracts
  • Marketing materials
  • Business website screenshots
  • Invoices and payment receipts
  • Proof of service delivery or client contracts

Start-ups, Acquisitions, and Franchises All Qualify

The E-2 rules allow these business types:
  1. Start-up Businesses
    Require strong documentation of:
    • Market need
    • Operational readiness
    • Start-up costs
    • Initial contracts or clients
    • Compliance with state licensing requirements
  2. Business Acquisitions
    Allowed provided the purchase was:
    • Legitimate
    • Documented
    • at risk
    • Properly valued
    The business must be active at the time of purchase (or reactivated under the investor’s plan).
  3. Franchises
    Franchises are often ideal because:
    • They provide proven business models
    • Strong documentation
    • Clear cost structures
    • Familiarity among consular officers

The “Job Shop” Disqualification

A job shop, in E-2 terms, is a U.S. business whose primary commercial activity is placing its own employees at the worksites of unrelated third-party companies, rather than producing its own goods or services for its own clients. The Department of State and USCIS will refuse to grant E-2 status to applicants whose employment depends on a job-shop arrangement. The rule is set out at 9 FAM 402.9-6(G)(d)–(f) and is reinforced by USCIS policy (Letter, Lorr, Acting Chief, Business and Trade Branch, INS, HQ 70/6.2.5-6 (1996)).
This disqualification matters most for:
  • IT staffing companies that place engineers at client sites
  • Consulting firms whose revenue model is selling labor hours to other companies’ projects
  • Outsourcing or BPO operations where the U.S. entity has no clients of its own
  • E-2 employees coming to the U.S. to work primarily at a third-party site rather than for the treaty enterprise
To avoid a job-shop characterization, the E-2 enterprise must demonstrate it is providing a unique, project-oriented service or commodity to its own clients, that work is performed under the enterprise’s own supervision, and that the enterprise carries genuine commercial risk on the engagement (not merely a markup on labor placed elsewhere). Mixed business models are possible but must be documented carefully.

Source of Funds Requirements for E-2 Investors

All capital invested in an E-2 business must be lawfully obtained, fully traceable from origin to the U.S. business, personally controlled by the investor, and at risk of partial or total loss. Acceptable sources include savings from lawful employment, business profits, sale of property, inheritance, documented gifts, and certain loans secured by personal (not business) assets. The investor must produce a contemporaneous documentary trail showing both the lawful source of the funds and the path the funds took from that source to the U.S. enterprise. A break in the documented path is one of the most common reasons for an E-2 RFE or refusal. The rule is at 8 CFR 214.2(e)(12) and the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 2, Part B, Chapter 3. See our detailed E-2 investment requirements analysis for additional context.

Funds Must Be from a Lawful Source

The investor must demonstrate that the invested capital came from legal, legitimate sources.
Acceptable sources include:
  • Savings from lawful employment
  • Business profits or distributions
  • Sale of property or assets
  • Inheritance
  • Gifts from family members
  • Refinancing of personally owned property
  • Dividends or investment income
  • Settlements or court awards (with documentation)

Source-of-funds rules vary by country of origin. For Japanese applicants navigating remittance and tax-reporting documentation, see our Japan-specific source-of-funds guide. For Italian applicants, our guide at vistoe2usa.it addresses Italian banking transfer and tax-reporting requirements.
Unacceptable or high-risk sources include:

  • Unexplained cash deposits
  • Undocumented transfers
  • Funds derived from illegal activity
  • Funds commingled without documentation
  • Anonymous or offshore sources lacking traceability
USCIS expects a clear, documented trail showing how funds were accumulated.

The “Path of Funds” Must Be Fully Documented

USCIS requires evidence showing the movement of funds from the original source into the U.S. enterprise.
This often includes:
  • Bank statements
  • Wire transfer receipts
  • Tax returns
  • Proof of asset sale
  • Executed purchase agreements
  • Deposit slips
  • Loan documents (if applicable)
  • Currency exchange confirmations
  • Screenshots from online banking (with identifying details)
Every step in the chain must be documented.
Example:
Sale of property → funds enter investor’s bank account → funds transferred to U.S. business → funds spent on business setup.
A break in the chain is a common reason for Requests for Evidence (RFEs) or visa denials.

The Investor Must Have Full Control Over the Funds

The investor must show they have exclusive control over the capital.
This means:
  • Funds must belong to the investor personally, or
  • Funds must be legally gifted to the investor, or
  • Funds must be personally guaranteed with personal liability
Unacceptable:
  • Funds controlled by a third party
  • Funds accessible only through a business partner
  • Shared accounts where another party controls disbursement
  • Loans where the investor has no personal liability
  • Business-secured loans (not at risk)
USCIS commonly refuses cases where the investor cannot prove full ownership and control of the invested capital.

Gifted Funds Are Allowed — With Documentation

Gifts are permissible if the gift is fully documented, including:
  • Proof the donor lawfully acquired the funds
  • Gift deed or declaration
  • Bank statements showing transfer
  • Explanation of relationship (if questioned)
Even gifted funds must meet source of funds rules.

Loans Are Allowed — With Restrictions

Loans may qualify if:
  • The investor is personally liable, and
  • The loan is secured by personal assets, not business assets
Examples of acceptable loans:
  • Home equity loans
  • Personal loans backed by personal property
  • Loans backed by personal financial assets
Loans do not qualify if:
  • Secured by business assets
  • Secured by the E-2 business itself
  • Structured with no personal liability
  • Issued by related entities without proper documentation
This is because the funds must be at risk, not protected by the business.

Commingled Funds Must Be Traceable

If personal and non-personal funds are commingled:
  • The investor must identify and trace the exact sum used for the investment
  • Provide statements showing separation where possible
  • Offer a clear narrative explaining the movement of money
Lack of traceability often results in RFEs or denials.

Evidence Required for Lawful Source and Control

Typical documentation includes:
  • Last 6–12 months of personal bank statements
  • Tax returns (2–5 years depending on source)
  • Proof of employment income or business earnings
  • Pay slips / salary evidence
  • Property sale deeds
  • Inheritance documents
  • Gift letters and donor documentation
  • Sale agreements for assets
  • Financial statements
  • Loan agreements and personal liability documentation
  • Screenshots showing transfers
  • Foreign tax filings (if necessary)
  • Certifying letters from banks or accountants
USCIS examines completeness, consistency, and credibility.

Source-of-Funds Issues That Trigger RFEs and Refusals

E-2 Investment Visa Source of Funds Denial Flags
  • ✘ Unexplained deposits: Large transfers with no documentation.
  • ✘ Incomplete documentation: Missing sale deeds, missing bank statements, missing proof of income.
  • ✘ Cash intensive income with no proper trail: Especially problematic in non-regulated sectors.
  • ✘ Loans with no personal liability: high-risk for refusal.
  • ✘ Offshore bank accounts with no supporting documents: Investor must show they personally own and control the funds.

Ownership and Control Requirements

An E-2 enterprise must be at least 50 percent owned by treaty-country nationals, and the principal investor must hold operational control of the business. Operational control is presumed when an individual investor owns 50 percent or more. Where ownership is below 50 percent, control can still be established through majority voting rights, weighted shares, a managerial position with unilateral decision-making authority, or a partnership agreement that vests operational direction in the investor. Passive ownership, however large, does not satisfy the requirement. Shares held by U.S. lawful permanent residents are excluded from the 50 percent treaty-national calculation, even where the LPR also holds treaty-country citizenship. The rule is at 8 CFR 214.2(e)(3)(ii) and is elaborated in 9 FAM 402.9-4(B).

Control Through Ownership (50 Percent Rule)

USCIS and the Department of State presume operational control when the investor owns:
  • At least 50% of the enterprise, or
  • Holds a controlling interest through voting rights or weighted shares
The 50 percent threshold is drawn directly from 8 CFR 214.2(e)(3)(ii) and is the cleanest way to establish control.
Even if the investor owns less than 50%, they may still qualify if:
  • Their voting rights exceed their equity percentage
  • They possess operational control through partnership or shareholder agreements
  • They serve as the managing member or CEO with unilateral decision-making authority
The key factor is operational control, not just ownership percentage. Where two or more treaty nationals together own 50 percent or more, the enterprise itself carries the nationality of the treaty country and may qualify even if no single individual reaches the 50 percent threshold.

Lawful Permanent Resident Shares Do Not Count Toward the 50 Percent Threshold

Shares held by U.S. lawful permanent residents (Green Card holders) are not counted toward the 50 percent treaty-national ownership threshold, even if the LPR also holds citizenship of a treaty country. This rule, set out in 9 FAM 402.9-4(B)(2), is one of the most commonly missed nationality-defect points in E-2 filings where ownership is split among multiple parties.

Evidence to Demonstrate Ownership and Control

Common documentation includes:
  • Operating agreement or shareholders’ agreement showing investor control
  • Stock certificates and share register
  • Corporate organizational chart with investor at the top
  • Voting rights documentation where ownership is under 50%
  • IRS EIN confirmation showing investor as principal
  • Minutes of organizational meetings
  • Articles of Organization or Incorporation

Develop and Direct the Enterprise

An E-2 investor must enter the United States solely to direct, develop, and actively manage the investment enterprise. Owning the business is not enough; the investor must actually run it. That means making the strategic decisions, supervising day-to-day operations, holding hiring and firing authority, and engaging actively in business management. An investor who plans to delegate all operational decisions to a hired manager, or to remain primarily abroad, will struggle to satisfy this requirement. The rule is at 8 CFR 214.2(e)(2) and is elaborated in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 2, Part B. The same standard governs E-2 visa renewals, where officers examine whether the investor has continued to direct and develop the enterprise during the prior period of stay.

The Investor Must Direct and Develop the Enterprise

Under 8 CFR 214.2(e)(2), the investor must show they will:
  • Make strategic decisions
  • Supervise day-to-day operations
  • Direct the enterprise’s growth and development
  • Have authority to hire and fire
  • Implement operational systems
  • Engage actively in business management
Passive ownership does not satisfy the requirement.

Active vs. Passive Involvement

The USCIS Policy Manual emphasizes that the investor must be actively involved in the business.
Reference: USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 2, Part B – Applicant Qualifications.
Active involvement includes:
  • Managing employees
  • Negotiating contracts
  • Overseeing financials
  • Supervising operations
  • Setting strategic direction
  • Handling client relationships
  • Ensuring regulatory compliance
Passive involvement (NOT acceptable):
  • Silent partnerships
  • Purely financial investment
  • Acting only as a shareholder
  • Outsourcing all decision-making
  • Hiring a manager to run daily operations without oversight
Where USCIS determines the investor will not actively direct the business, the application is highly likely to be refused.

Qualifying Role for E-2 Employees

E-2 employees must also satisfy the develop-and-direct standard if applying as executives or supervisors. Defined in 8 CFR 214.2(e)(3), acceptable roles include:
  • Chief Executive Officer
  • Chief Operating Officer
  • Managing Director
  • Senior Manager
  • Operations Supervisor
Employees in non-supervisory or non-executive roles must show essential, specialized skills (addressed in a later section).

Evidence to Demonstrate Development and Direction

Common documentation includes:
  • Appointment letters naming the investor as CEO/MD/Manager
  • Job description detailing strategic and managerial duties
  • Employment contracts of subordinate staff
  • Resumes demonstrating managerial or executive experience
  • Business plan outlining management structure
USCIS evaluates whether the investor’s role is substantive and decision-making in nature.

Remote Management and Multi-Country Operations

Remote oversight can satisfy the rule in limited cases if:
  • The investor retains operational control
  • The business has on-site management
  • The investor frequently travels to the U.S.
  • The management structure supports cross-border direction
However, consular posts vary in tolerance, and many prefer clear on-site management by the investor.

Intent to Depart the United States

An E-2 visa applicant must demonstrate an intent to depart the United States when E-2 status ends. Unlike the H-1B and L-1 categories, the E-2 is not a dual intent visa, so an active pursuit of a U.S. Green Card can complicate (though not necessarily defeat) an E-2 application. In practice, an unequivocal statement of intent to depart at the consular interview, supported by a credible business plan and no contradictory record on the DS-160 or DS-156E, is normally sufficient. The rule is set out in 8 CFR 214.2(e)(5) and elaborated at 9 FAM 402.9-4(C).

An Unequivocal Statement of Intent Is Normally Sufficient

The good news for E-2 applicants is that the threshold is lower than for most other nonimmigrant categories. The applicant does not need a residence abroad that they have no intent to abandon. The applicant may sell their home in the treaty country and move all household effects to the United States. What is required is the applicant’s “unequivocal” expression of intent to depart the U.S. when E-2 status terminates, which a consular officer will normally accept as sufficient (9 FAM 402.9-4(C)).
In practice, this is satisfied by:
  • A clear statement at the consular interview that the applicant will depart the U.S. when E-2 status ends
  • A signed statement of intent in the application package
  • Consistent answers across the DS-160, DS-156E, and interview

When Intent to Depart Becomes Difficult to Establish

The intent requirement becomes harder to satisfy if the applicant has taken steps consistent with permanently remaining in the United States. The most common scenarios that raise consular scrutiny are:
  • An approved or pending I-140 immigrant petition (employment-based green card)
  • An approved or pending I-130 immigrant petition (family-based green card)
  • An approved labor certification (PERM)
  • Pending adjustment of status (I-485)
None of these are an automatic bar to E-2 issuance. Under 8 CFR 214.2(e)(5) and 9 FAM 402.9-4(C), an E-2 visa cannot be denied solely because the applicant is the beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition. However, the applicant must still satisfy the consular officer that they intend to depart at the end of E-2 status, and the burden of demonstrating that intent is higher in these cases. This is one of the most consequential reasons to plan a U.S. immigration strategy carefully from the start.

Note on Adjustment of Status from E-2

If an E-2 holder later decides to pursue a green card from inside the United States, they will need to file Form I-508 with the adjustment package — a written waiver of all rights, privileges, exemptions, and immunities that might otherwise accrue to the E visa holder by virtue of that status (such as certain tax-treaty benefits). The I-508 waiver requirement is unique to E classifications (other than E-3 Australians, who are exempt) and is covered in detail on our comprehensive E-2 guide.

E-2 Employee Eligibility Requirements (and Family Eligibility)

Treaty-country employees of an E-2 enterprise and the principal investor’s spouse and unmarried children under 21 may qualify for E-2 status. Employee eligibility requires shared nationality with the E-2 enterprise plus a role that is either executive, supervisory, or essential-skills. Spouse and child eligibility carries no nationality restriction. E-2 spouses are work-authorized incident to status. The rules appear at 8 CFR 214.2(e)(3)–(4).

Eligibility for E-2 Employees

Under 8 CFR 214.2(e)(3), an employee may qualify for an E-2 visa only if all three of the following conditions are met:

1. The employee must share the same nationality as the E-2 enterprise

The enterprise’s nationality is determined by its ownership, not by its place of incorporation.
For example:
If the business is 60% French-owned, only French nationals may qualify as E-2 employees.

2. The employee must fill a qualifying position

Only two categories of employees qualify:
  1. Executive or Supervisory employees
    Roles include:
    • CEO
    • COO
    • Managing Director
    • Senior Manager
    • Operations Director
    They must have authority over:
    • Policy decisions
    • Strategic planning
    • Hiring and firing
    • Business operations
  2. Employees with essential skills
    These individuals possess specialized knowledge not readily available in the U.S. labor market.
    USCIS evaluates:
    • The degree of proven expertise
    • Whether training U.S. workers is feasible
    • How long the essential skills will be required
    • The critical nature of the employee’s contribution
    Guidance appears in the USCIS Policy Manual – Chapter 4: E-2 Employees.

For Singapore-based companies sponsoring essential-skills employees into the U.S., see our Singapore E-2 employee visa guide, including how attorneys can attend the interview at the U.S. Embassy at 27 Napier Road.

3. The employment must be with the E-2 enterprise

The employee must be coming to the U.S.:
  • To work only for the E-2 employer,
  • In the qualifying position,
  • And under the supervision of the enterprise.

Evidence Required for E-2 Employees

Typical supporting documentation includes:
  • Passport showing treaty nationality
  • Employment contract
  • Detailed executive, supervisory, or essential-skills job description
  • Resume/CV showing relevant experience
  • Organizational chart showing reporting structure
  • Proof of corporate ownership confirming nationality of enterprise
  • Business need explanation for essential-skills employees
  • Training plans or transition plans (if applicable)
Consular posts frequently request thorough documentation for essential-skills roles.

E-2 Dependents (Spouse and Children Under 21)

Under 8 CFR 214.2(e)(4), dependents of E-2 investors and E-2 employees may accompany them to the United States.
Eligible dependents:
  • Spouse (no nationality restriction)
  • Unmarried children under 21 (no nationality restriction)
Dependents receive E-2 dependent status, which carries several important benefits.

Work Authorization for E-2 Spouses

E-2 spouses are allowed to work in the United States without restriction.
Since November 2021, USCIS grants employment authorization incident to status upon admission, eliminating the need for a separate EAD in most cases.
Spouses may:
  • Work for any U.S. employer
  • Start their own business
  • Be self-employed
  • Work full-time or part-time
This greatly enhances the attractiveness of the E-2 visa for families.
Reference:
USCIS Policy Manual – Chapter 5: E-2 Spouses

School and Study Rights for E-2 Children

Children in E-2 dependent status may:
  • Attend school (K-12)
  • Enroll in college or university
  • Attend vocational programs
However, they cannot work while in E-2 status.

Duration and Extensions for Employees and Family Members

Dependents and employees receive the same period of stay as the principal E-2 investor.
Extensions are available indefinitely, provided:
  • The business continues to meet E-2 requirements
  • All dependents continue to qualify

Why Employee and Dependent Applications Sometimes Fail

E-2 Investment Visa "Dependent E-2 Visa" Denial Flags
  • ✘ Employee does not share the nationality of the treaty enterprise: One of the most common reasons for employee denials.
  • ✘ Job duties are too junior: Roles resembling regular staff employees rarely qualify.
  • ✘ Insufficient evidence of essential skills: USCIS expects detailed documentation.
  • ✘ Dependents over age 21: They "age out" and lose dependent eligibility.
  • ✘ Marriage not documented for spouse applications: Consulates require official marriage certificates.

Common Problems That Cause E-2 Requirement Refusals

Most E-2 refusals trace to a small number of recurring problems with one or more of the requirements above. The list below maps the most common practical failure points onto the specific requirement each one threatens. Each is in scope for satisfying that requirement; none is an additional rule.

Source-of-Funds Problems

Source-of-funds problems are the most common reason E-2 cases fail in practice. Typical patterns: an unexplained deposit at the start of the funding trail; cash-intensive income with no contemporaneous paper trail; commingled accounts where the investor's funds cannot be separated from family or business funds; or layered holding structures the applicant cannot fully explain. The rule (8 CFR 214.2(e)(12); USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 2, Part B, Chapter 3) requires full traceability from origin to the U.S. business; without it, officers commonly refuse the case rather than approve one they cannot trace.

Marginality Problems

Marginality problems usually appear when the business model is genuinely lean — a solo-operator service business, a digital-first model with no employees, or a low-overhead consultancy — and the file does not adequately demonstrate present or future capacity to generate more than minimal living income (8 CFR 214.2(e)(15)). The fix is rarely more investment. It is a credible five-year financial projection, documented contracts or customer pipeline, a hiring plan, and clear evidence the business can scale beyond supporting one person.

Passive or Speculative Business Models

The E-2 visa is not available for passive or speculative investments. Cases fail under the business requirement (INA § 101(a)(15)(E); the "bona fide enterprise" standard) when the investment is in undeveloped land, raw real estate held for appreciation, pure stock or fund holdings, paper companies with no operational infrastructure, or franchises that have not yet secured premises, licences, or inventory. Officers refuse cases where the business is not operational or "immediately capable of commencing operations."

Unclear or Defective Ownership Structures

Ownership problems most often arise where the U.S. enterprise has multiple owners and the 50 percent treaty-national threshold cannot be cleanly documented (8 CFR 214.2(e)(3)(ii)); where lawful permanent resident shares are mistakenly counted toward the threshold even though 9 FAM 402.9-4(B)(2) excludes them; or where holding-company structures obscure ultimate beneficial ownership.

Weak Operational Control

An investor who owns less than 50 percent and cannot demonstrate operational control through voting rights, weighted shares, or a unilateral managerial role will struggle to satisfy the ownership-and-control requirement. Officers look for a clean documentary record — operating agreement, shareholders’ agreement, board minutes, appointment letters — not just verbal representations at interview.

Funds Not Genuinely Committed or At Risk

The investment requirement is not met where funds are left in the investor’s personal account pending visa approval, where the investment is contingent on the visa with no escrow mechanism, where loans are secured by the E-2 business assets themselves, or where promissory notes carry no personal liability (8 CFR 214.2(e)(12); 9 FAM 402.9-6(B)). The visa is for capital that has been committed and exposed to loss — not for "intent to invest." Escrow, used correctly, is the most underappreciated solution to this problem.

What Consular Officers Actually Look for in E-2 Cases

The seven core requirements are not weighted equally in practice, and source-of-funds evidence cuts across all of them. In our experience handling E-2 cases at U.S. consulates worldwide, adjudications often focus less on the raw investment amount and more on whether the business looks credible, operational, and commercially viable as a whole. The factors that consistently drive consular outcomes are:
  • Source-of-funds clarity over investment amount. A clean, fully traceable source-of-funds file with a $90,000 investment beats a chaotic file with $300,000 most days. Officers refuse cases they cannot trace, regardless of size.
  • Operational readiness over operational planning. Leases signed, inventory purchased, websites live, vendors contracted, payroll prepared. A business that is "about to open" raises more questions than one that opened last week.
  • Commercial realism over commercial ambition. Five-year projections must be defensible against industry benchmarks. Officers refuse cases built on speculative or hypothetical income, even where the investor has spent freely.
  • Hiring realism. A solo-operator service business with no hiring plan invites marginality scrutiny. A business with one or two hires plus a documented 12-month plan to hire more is significantly stronger than the same business presented as a permanent solo enterprise.
  • Investor experience and credibility. Officers ask: does this applicant have the background, language, and commercial judgment to actually run this business? A mismatch between the investor’s prior career and the proposed enterprise raises a credibility concern.
  • Investor genuinely runs the business. Passive ownership, however large, will not satisfy the develop-and-direct requirement. Officers want to see the investor making strategic decisions, holding hiring and firing authority, and engaging actively in day-to-day management.
  • Internal file consistency. The DS-160, DS-156E, business plan, source-of-funds memo, and interview answers must tell the same story without gaps or contradictions. Inconsistencies are flagged in the consular notes and follow the case forward.
Investment amount alone is never sufficient. A weak case at $400,000 is still a weak case. A strong case at $90,000 can succeed where the file is internally consistent and the documentary record is clean.

Two Practical Questions Investors Frequently Ask

Can an E-2 Investment Come From a Loan?

Yes, but with restrictions. Loans can be used to fund part or all of an E-2 investment if they are secured by the investor’s personal assets, or are unsecured personal loans for which the investor is personally liable. The investor must remain personally exposed to loss, which is what makes the investment “at risk” under 8 CFR 214.2(e)(12).
Loans secured by the assets of the E-2 business itself, however, do not qualify. Where the only collateral is the business that will be acquired with the loan, the investor faces no personal financial exposure if the business fails — the lender takes the business, not the investor’s personal wealth. That structure does not place the investor’s capital at risk and will not satisfy the investment requirement.
Promissory notes from third parties (for example, the seller of a business agreeing to be paid over time) may be acceptable where the investor is personally liable on the note. They will not be acceptable where the note is secured only by the business assets.

Can Two Investors Apply Under the Same Business?

Yes, provided both investors hold the qualifying treaty-country nationality and the combined treaty-national ownership of the enterprise is at least 50 percent. Each investor must independently meet all eight core requirements: nationality, substantial at-risk investment proportionate to their stake, operational role in the business, and so on. Each investor files a separate E-2 application; the business is treated as having the nationality of its qualifying treaty-national owners.
Two practical complications arise. First, where the two investors hold different treaty nationalities, the business is deemed to have the nationality of both owners, but only an investor sharing one of those nationalities can apply as a principal. Second, where the two investors split ownership 50/50, neither has a clean majority — operational control must then be established through the operating agreement, voting rights, or a defined management structure rather than from ownership alone. Both investors must each make a substantial investment proportionate to their share of the business; one cannot piggy-back on the other’s capital.
Eligibility is one part of the E-2 picture. Several adjacent topics are covered in detail on companion pages:
  • E-1 and E-2 Visa Application Process: Consular Processing vs. Change of Status. Compares the choice between applying at a U.S. consulate abroad and filing a USCIS change of status from inside the U.S., including the trade-offs in timing, evidentiary standards, and consequences for international travel.
  • E-2 Visa Process. Covers the procedural mechanics: Form DS-160, Form DS-156E, change of status via Form I-129, period of admission (typically two-year increments), 10-day and 60-day grace periods, the consular interview, and E-visa company registration practices at posts such as London, Tokyo, and Singapore.
  • E-2 Visa Costs. Government fees, legal fees, business plan costs, and investment thresholds for 2026, including the DS-160 fee and reciprocity fees by country.
  • Best U.S. Cities for Foreign Founders & Investor Visa Options. A ranked comparison of 42 U.S. metros covering entry cost, labor cost, tax burden, family quality of life, and the E-2, L-1A, and EB-5 visa pathways for investors choosing where to set up their U.S. operations.
  • E-2 Visa Renewal. Renewal documentation, the additional evidentiary expectations consular officers apply at renewal, and how to handle substantive vs. non-substantive corporate changes during the validity period.
  • E-2 Treaty Countries List. Current treaty countries plus reciprocity validity periods and fees by nationality.
  • Comprehensive E-2 Visa Guide. The full overview of E-2 benefits, family eligibility, and how the E-2 fits into broader U.S. business immigration strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions: E-2 Visa Requirements

How much do you need to invest for an E-2 visa? There is no statutory minimum investment amount for an E-2 visa. The investment must be substantial in proportion to the total cost of the business. In practice, successful E-2 investments commonly range from USD 100,000 to 300,000, but lower amounts can qualify for low-cost service businesses where the investor funds close to 100% of the start-up cost. USCIS applies an "inverted sliding scale": the smaller the business, the higher the percentage of total cost the investor must contribute.
What is the minimum investment for an E-2 visa in 2026? There is no fixed minimum. U.S. law does not set a dollar threshold for the E-2 visa. The Department of State and USCIS apply a proportionality test rather than a hard floor. We have seen E-2 visas approved with investments under USD 100,000 where the business model is genuinely lean and the proportionality is right. Most consular officers are most comfortable with investments above USD 100,000.
What is the E-2 visa marginality test? The E-2 marginality test asks whether the business has the present or future capacity to generate more than minimal living income for the investor and family. Future capacity is assessed within five years. A business that exists only to support the investor with no realistic prospect of doing more is "marginal" and will be refused. There is no minimum employee count, but creating U.S. jobs is the easiest way to defeat the marginality test in practice.
Can I get an E-2 visa with no employees? Yes. There is no rule requiring an E-2 business to have employees at the time of filing. Davies & Associates secured an E-2 approval at the U.S. Embassy in London in April 2026 for HeadLight Glasses with zero employees on payroll at filing, on the basis of inventory and digital advertising spend. However, how strictly the marginality test is applied varies between consulates, so the same zero-employee model is not equally well received at every post.
Which countries qualify for the E-2 visa? Around 80 countries have a qualifying E-2 treaty or equivalent arrangement with the United States, including the United Kingdom, Italy, Japan, Singapore, Canada, Mexico, Germany, France, Spain, Australia, the Netherlands, Grenada, and Turkey. The arrangement may be a Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (FCN), a Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT), or a Free Trade Agreement such as the USMCA. India, China, Russia, Vietnam, and South Africa do not have a qualifying treaty. The full list is maintained at 9 FAM 402.9-10 and on the E-2 treaty countries page.
Can Indian or Chinese citizens get an E-2 visa? Not directly. India, China, Russia, Vietnam, and South Africa do not have qualifying E-2 treaties with the United States. Two routes exist: (1) obtain citizenship in an E-2 treaty country through a citizenship-by-investment programme (commonly Grenada or Turkey) and then apply for the E-2 visa, or (2) pursue the EB-5 immigrant investor visa, which leads directly to a U.S. Green Card. Note: under PL 117-263 (effective 27 December 2022), applicants who acquired treaty-country nationality through financial investment must have been domiciled in that country for three continuous years before applying for an E-2 visa.
How long is an E-2 visa valid? An E-2 visa is generally issued for up to five years per visa stamp, depending on the reciprocity schedule for the applicant’s country. Reciprocity periods vary widely: the UK, Italy, Japan, and Germany are typically issued for five years; some countries are issued for one or two years. Each entry to the U.S. on a valid E-2 visa carries an admission period of up to two years. There is no statutory cap on the number of renewals.
Is the E-2 visa a path to a U.S. Green Card? No. The E-2 visa is a nonimmigrant visa and does not itself lead to permanent residence. However, E-2 holders can pursue a Green Card through a separate immigrant category later, most commonly EB-5 (investor), EB-1C (multinational manager), or EB-2 NIW (national interest waiver). E-2 applicants seeking adjustment of status to a Green Card from inside the United States must file Form I-508 to waive certain treaty rights, except for E-3 Australians who are exempt.
Can I get an E-2 visa if I have an approved I-140 or pending Green Card application? Yes, in principle, but the burden of demonstrating nonimmigrant intent is higher. An E-2 visa cannot be denied solely because the applicant is the beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition (per 9 FAM 402.9-4(C)). However, the applicant must still convince the consular officer that they intend to depart the U.S. when E-2 status ends. This is one of the most important reasons to plan a U.S. immigration strategy carefully from the outset.
What is a "real and operating" business for E-2 purposes? A "real and operating" business (the statutory term is "bona fide enterprise") is one that is actively engaged in producing goods or services for profit. The business must be operational or "immediately capable of commencing operations" at the time of E-2 adjudication. Passive investments such as undeveloped land, pure stock holdings, idle paper companies, and speculative real estate purchases do not qualify. Franchises and existing business acquisitions are typically the strongest candidates because they are documented and operational from day one.
What is the E-2 visa source of funds requirement? The E-2 source-of-funds requirement is that all invested capital must be lawfully obtained, fully traceable from origin to U.S. business, personally controlled by the investor, and at risk of partial or total loss. Acceptable sources include savings from lawful employment, business profits, sale of property, inheritance, gifts (with donor documentation), and certain loans secured by personal assets. Loans secured by the E-2 business assets do not qualify because they are not "at risk." A break in the documented path of funds is one of the most common reasons for an E-2 RFE or refusal.
Can I bring my family on an E-2 visa? Yes. The principal E-2 investor’s spouse and unmarried children under 21 may apply for derivative E-2 visas, regardless of their nationality. The spouse is work-authorized incident to status (no separate EAD required since November 2021) and may work for any U.S. employer or start their own business. Children may attend school but cannot work. Children "age out" of E-2 dependent status at 21.

Frequently Asked Questions About the E-2 Visa for UK Nationals

1. Can UK citizens get an E-2 visa? Yes. British citizens are eligible for the E-2 Treaty Investor visa because the United Kingdom is a treaty country.
The investment can be used for a new business, an existing business, or a qualifying franchise, but the business must be active and operating rather than passive or speculative.
2. Where do UK nationals apply for the E-2 visa? UK nationals usually apply through the U.S. Embassy in London, which has a dedicated E-visa process for treaty investor applications. In most cases, the application is first prepared and submitted to the Embassy for review before an interview is scheduled.
Because London has its own procedures and document expectations, applicants should prepare the case specifically for London rather than assuming that other consulates use the same process.
3. Do British citizens need to live in the UK to apply for an E-2 visa in London? Applicants filing through the U.S. Embassy in London should be prepared to show that they are resident in the Embassy’s consular district, as London applies a residence-based filing expectation in E visa cases.
Applicants are often asked to prove this with documents such as utility bills, council tax records, lease or mortgage documents, payslips, and bank statements showing ongoing local activity. Driver licences and mobile phone bills are usually weaker evidence and should not be relied on alone.
4. How much do I need to invest for an E-2 visa from the UK? There is no fixed statutory minimum investment amount for an E-2 visa. Instead, the investment must be substantial in relation to the type of business and large enough to make the enterprise viable and operational.
For lower-cost service businesses, this often means the investor must fund a very high percentage of the start-up cost. For more expensive businesses, a lower percentage may still qualify if the overall amount is credible, committed, and sufficient to launch or run the enterprise properly.
5. Can I buy an existing U.S. business and still qualify for an E-2 visa? Yes. Many UK applicants qualify by purchasing an existing U.S. business rather than starting one from scratch. Others use franchises or new business set-ups. What matters is that the investment is committed, the business is real and operating, and the applicant will direct and develop it.
If you are buying an existing business, you should be able to document the purchase price, the source of funds, and the operational viability of the company after the acquisition.
6. How long is the E-2 visa valid for UK nationals? For UK nationals, E-2 visas are commonly issued for up to 5 years on a multiple-entry basis. That does not mean you are automatically given 5 years of stay in the United States in one block.
Instead, each time you enter the United States in E-2 status, you are usually admitted for up to 2 years. As long as the business continues to qualify and you continue to meet the requirements, the visa can generally be renewed again.
7. Can the E-2 visa be renewed indefinitely? Yes, potentially. There is no fixed maximum number of E-2 renewals, provided the business continues to qualify and the investor continues to meet E-2 visa requirements.
In practice, renewal cases should show that the business is still operating, the investor still owns or controls it, and the company continues to support the original E-2 purpose rather than becoming dormant or purely passive.
8. Can my spouse and children come with me on an E-2 visa? Yes. A UK E-2 investor’s spouse and unmarried children under 21 can usually apply for derivative E visas. These derivative visas allow the family to live in the United States with the principal investor.
Spouses are generally permitted to work in the United States, and children may attend school. However, children only qualify as derivatives while they remain unmarried and under 21, so families should plan ahead for age-out issues.
9. Can my business bring UK staff to the United States on E-2 visas? Sometimes, yes. A qualifying E-2 business may be able to sponsor employees who share the nationality of the treaty enterprise and will work in executive, supervisory, or essential-skills roles. For a UK-owned E-2 business, that can include British employees in the right positions.
The employee application is separate from the principal investor’s case, and the business must be able to show both qualifying ownership and the employee’s role within the company.
10. How long does the E-2 visa process take in London? Processing times in London vary and can change without notice depending on Embassy workload and the quality of the initial submission. In London, cases are generally reviewed by the E-visa unit before an interview is scheduled, so preparation quality can materially affect timing.
Applicants should allow time for the Embassy’s review as well as for assembling the business, source-of-funds, and residency evidence needed for a strong filing.
As of April 2026, E-2 visa interviews are taking 3-6 months to schedule in London.
11. Do I need a business plan for an E-2 visa application from the UK? Usually, yes. A strong E-2 application should include a business plan or equivalent evidence showing how the company will operate, generate revenue, and avoid being considered marginal. This is especially important for new businesses and start-ups.
The business plan should be realistic and consistent with the investment amount, the nature of the business, and the supporting documents submitted to the U.S. Embassy in London.
12. Is the E-2 visa a path to a green card for UK nationals? No. Not directly. The E-2 is a nonimmigrant visa, so it does not by itself lead to permanent residence. However, many investors later use other strategies to move from E-2 status to a green card category if they become eligible.
Because the long-term strategy varies by business structure, nationality, family circumstances, and investment plans, UK applicants often review this issue early before choosing the E-2 route.

Disclaimer

This guide is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration outcomes depend on specific case details. Prospective investors should consult a qualified U.S. immigration attorney.
Choosing E-2 representation: For practical guidance on selecting an E-2 lawyer, including the questions to ask and the credentials that matter most, see our companion resource:

Guide to Choosing an E-2 Visa Lawyer in 2026

About the Authors

Mark I Davies, Esq.

Chairman of Davies & Associates; focused on E visa strategy and complex consular filings.
Mark I Davies, Esq. JD, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Licensed with the SRA (SRA ID: 384468) in the UK, Member Law Society of England & Wales, MBA, Wharton School of Business. Licensed (USA) with the Georgia State Bar. AILA Member.
Area Details
Education JD, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School | MBA (Finance), The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania | Chartered Accountant (ICAEW)
Financial Training Completed Analyst Training Program at a major international bank | Chartered Accountant background with professional training in financial analysis and reporting
Legal Practice Admitted to practice in Georgia (USA) | Registered Solicitor with the Law Society of England & Wales | Former CMBS lawyer at one of the world's largest international law firms
Immigration Track Record 15+ years advising HNW investors. Track record of consistent approvals for clients who follow our source-of-funds documentation methodology. Hundreds of successful EB-5 and E-2 cases globally.
Recognition Named a Top 25 EB-5 Immigration Attorney by EB5 Investors Magazine (2018–2023)
Professional Engagements Lecturer/trainer for other lawyers at AILA, ACA, University of Pennsylvania Law School | Frequent speaker at global investment immigration conferences

Awards

Top 25 Immigration Attorneys

Contact Davies & Associates Offices in United States

Check all of our locations around the world.

Company location

New York Office World Trade Center
1 World Trade Center, Suite 8500, New York, NY 10007
Map and Driving Directions

New York Office E69th Street
200 E 69th Street, 2N, New York, NY 10022
Map and Driving Directions
California Office
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150, Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Map and Driving Directions
Philadelphia Office
1500 John F Kennedy Blvd, Suite 450, PMB 41, Philadelphia, PA 19102
Map and Driving Directions
Los Angeles Office
601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4050, Los Angeles, CA 90017
Map and Driving Directions
Chicago Office
155 N. Upper Wacker Dr., Suite 4250, Chicago, IL 60606
Map and Driving Directions
Miami Office
80 S.W. 8th St., Suite 2000, Miami, FL 33130
Map and Driving Directions
Atlanta Office
1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 3650, Atlanta, GA 30309
Map and Driving Directions

Telephone number

New York Office World Trade Center
+1 212 537 9196
Fax: +1 949 396 1371

New York Office E69th Street
+1 212 537 9196
Fax: +1 949 396 1371
California Office
+1 949 620 1811
Fax: +1 949 396 1371
Philadelphia Office
+1 215 525 1881
Fax: +1 949 396 1371
Chicago Office
+1 312 261 8560
Fax: +1 949 396 1371
Miami Office
786 490 2661
Fax: +1 949 396 1371

Contact us by email

Send us a message



Top 25 EB-5 Immigration Attorneys 2023

Avvo Client Reviews Badge for Mark Ivan DaviesMark Ivan DaviesReviewsout of 24 reviews

E-2 Visas for UK Citizens E-2 Visas for UK Citizens

EB-5 Lawyers in the UK EB-5 Lawyers in the UK

E-2 Visas for Italians E-2 Visas for Italians

E-2 Visas for Australians E-2 Visas for Australians

E-2 Visas for Singaporeans E-2 Visas for Singaporeans

E-2 Visas in New York City E-2 Visas in New York City

E-2 Visas in Miami E-2 Visas in Miami

EB-5 Lawyers in New York EB-5 Lawyers in New York

EB-5 Lawyers in Miami EB-5 Lawyers in Miami

E-2 Visas for Canadians E-2 Visas for Canadians

E-2 Visas from the UAE E-2 Visas from the UAE

E-2 Visas for Argentinians E-2 Visas for Argentinians

E-2 Visas for Germans E-2 Visas for Germans

E-2 Visas for French E-2 Visas for French

E-2 Visas for Turkish E-2 Visas for Turkish

E-2 Visas for Grenadians E-2 Visas for Grenadians

E-2 Visas for Taiwanese E-2 Visas for Taiwanese


Davies & Associates BBB Business Review logo

Davies & Associates Trustpilot reviews badge



Request Free Consultation
Yes, I agree to receive occasional text messages (SMS)
 
Confidential. No obligation. We do not sell your information.



Our services

Looking to acquire an E-2 Visa?

We are known for our creative solutions that obtain "impossible" visas. We solve the most complex immigration problems for businesses, investors, individuals, and families.

E-2 Visa Immigration lawyer near me

Several lawyers told me I would not be able to get a TN visa. Two weeks after contacting Davies & Associates I was working in New York, visa in hand.

Individual seeking 'Impossible' TN Visa

D&A was very detail-oriented and very thorough in what they did. They worked on my case 24/7 and were very patient in answering all my questions.

E-2 Visa Client

My case felt complex but D&A managed the whole process carefully and helped me move seamlessly from one stage to the next.

E2 + CBI Client

D&A was my guiding light through the entire EB-5 process.

EB-5 Visa Client

I would definitely be a big advocate for the rest of my life for anyone wanting to explore the Grenada Citizenship by Investment Programme leading to the E-2 visa. The most important thing is a good team behind you. With Davies & Associates, you're in safe hands... you need someone who can support you on the ground and, again, you are well taken care of by D&A. The people are really warm, very helpful and quite open-minded when it comes to business... Not to mention as a passport it's great from a travel perspective... It's just 4 to 5 hours from New York.

Grenada CBI + E2 Visa Client

The entire process of getting an EB-5 visa is handled in a professional way by Mark Davies and his team. EB-5 is a wonderful option for anyone considering moving to the United States if you have the means. I was hoping to use the H-1B route for my children, but it became unreliable and so I looked to the EB-5 visa instead. It is great for anyone who has the resources. Mark gives you the first meetings himself which gives you great comfort. Both Mark and Sanjay are abundantly available and I even had the pleasure of hosting them at my house.

Parent of 2 EB-5 visa holders

I'm in the process of extending my L-1 visa. I submitted a few questions regarding my case, and he contacted me back almost immediately, both by email and telephone. Unlike other attorneys I met before, he gave me the impression of knowing off the top of his head what kind of visa I have, and what actions had to be taken to extend it. He is very thorough and clear regarding the process and what to expect in terms of timelines and issues that may arise. He is constantly in contact, so you definitely know he's working on your case.

L-1B Visa Holder

Mark Davies is a joy to work with. His extensive knowledge, speedy response and attentive service took away all my fears of dealing with immigration and visa applications. He is very generous with his time in explaining every step along the way and I have already and will in the future recommend him to anybody who is looking for an immigration lawyer.

E2 Visa for Small Professional Business With International Offices

Davies & Associates assisted us with an immigration emergency involving my brother's fiancée who was outside the United States. They assisted us in a highly professional manner, working with the relevant US embassy, US immigration and the governments of two other countries. As a result of their efforts the individual involved is now working in the United States. While their knowledge of the law is exemplary what really distinguishes this firm and attorney Davies from any other firm we have worked with is their dedication to customer service and their unrivaled level of professionalism.

Complex Fiancée Visa Need Involving Multiple International Jurisdictions

Several lawyers told me I would not be able to get a TN visa. Two weeks after contacting Davies & Associates I was working in New York, visa in hand. I have recommended this firm to several friends and colleagues, they do an excellent job every time.

Individual Seeking 'Impossible' TN Visa

I was qualified as a physician in a foreign country. Being on a J1 visa I was facing having to leave the United States and return to my home country. Davies & Associates secured one of only 30 J1 visa waivers available in my State, allowing me to work for a US hospital and remain in the United States.

Doctor Seeking J1 Visa Waiver

I am very satisfied with the services Mark Davies has provided me. He has a very extensive knowledge in immigration laws and has a thorough approach to any case.

U Visa Applicant, A Victim of Crime
What Our Client Says

Looking to relocate or having trouble with a visa application?

We are known for our creative solutions that obtain "impossible" visas. We solve the most complex immigration problems for business, investors, individuals and families.

Request Free Consultation

Our Locations

New York Office World Trade Center:
1 World Trade Center, Suite 8500, New York, NY 10007
+1 212 537 9196
Map and Driving Directions

New York Office E69th Street:
200 E 69th Street, 2N, New York, NY 10022
+1 212 537 9196
Map and Driving Directions

California Office:
555 Anton Blvd, Suite 150, Costa Mesa, CA 92626
+1 949 620 1811
Map and Driving Directions

Philadelphia Office:
1500 John F Kennedy Blvd, Suite 450, PMB 41, Philadelphia, PA 19102
+1 215 525 1881
Map and Driving Directions

London Office:
69 Old Broad Street, Dashwood House, London EC2M 1QS, United Kingdom
+44 20 3884 1812
Map and Driving Directions

London Office Beaufort Court:
Beaufort Court, Admiral Way, London E14 9XL, United Kingdom
+44 20 3884 1812
Map and Driving Directions

Edinburgh Office:
28 Rutland Square, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH1 2BW
+44 (20) 38841812
Map and Driving Directions

Milton Keynes Office:
The Pinnacle, 170 Midsummer Blvd, Milton Keynes MK9 1FE, United Kingdom
+44 7740 000769
Map and Driving Directions

Glasgow Office:

+44 131 392 0686
Map and Driving Directions

Vietnam Office:
46th Floor, Bitexco Financial Tower, 2 Hai Trieu, Ben Nghe Ward, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
+84 28 44582309
Map and Driving Directions

India Office:
Enam Sambhav C-20, G Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Mumbai 400051, Maharashtra
+91 720 856 4057
Map and Driving Directions

Italy Office:
Via Bonifacio Lupi 29, 50129 Firenze FI, Italy
+39 055 076 3054
Map and Driving Directions

Manila Office:
Unit 107, AIC Burgundy Empire Tower, ADB Ave. cor Garnet and Sapphire Streets, Ortigas Center, Pasig City 1605, Metro Manila, Philippines
+63 2 7215 7878
Map and Driving Directions

Sydney Office:
Level 12, 210 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia
+61 2 9156 1032
Map and Driving Directions

Perth Office:
Davies & Associates LLC, Level 1, 12 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000, Australia
+61 2 9156 1032
Map and Driving Directions

Singapore Office:
160 Robinson Road, #14-04, Singapore Business Federation Centre, Singapore 068914
+65-9615-0528
Map and Driving Directions

Looking for an Immigration attorney?

Immigration lawyer near me

List of US Embassies, Consulates and USCIS
List of Italian Embassies, Consulates and USCIS

Important Links


Avvo Client Reviews Badge for Mark Ivan DaviesMark Ivan DaviesReviewsout of 24 reviews

Davies & Associates LLC BBB Business Review

Have a question or would like to discuss your visa requirements?

Speak to us

Copyright ©2026 by Davies & Associates LLC.